- Posted by: Jeff in GroomsmenComplications

What to Do If: She Wants Her Guy-Friends as Groomsmen

 A reader writes us with the following, which demands to be printed in its entirety:

______

"Here's my problem. My fiancée asked me if she should have my sister as a bridesmaid. I told her my sister wouldn't care either way, so it was up to her.

My fiancée asked my mom (good call) and apparently my sister would care, so she is now in the wedding.

At this point everything is great. Then we are talking about my groomsmen and my fiancée starts suggesting HER guy friends for a spot. I shot down her two suggestions because the first guy is a tool and has been rude to me every time he's seen me. The other guy seems alright, but I've met him one time for a total of 30 seconds.

This all went down about a week ago. Last night fiancée started flipping out on me and said that she feels like I "owe" her a spot since she invited my sister to be a bridesmaid. Apparently since she gave up a spot for my sister, she thinks that she should get to fill a groomsman spot with one of her friends.

My two arguments were this:

1.) I didn't ask her to ask my sister, so why should I give her guy friend a spot to compensate

2.) She didn't bring this up when she was tossing out suggestions, so I thought she was just brainstorming, so I felt free to say no. (she said she shouldn't have had to ask for the spot, I should have KNOWN)

So what do I do? Let her pick a groomsman that I barely know or is a dick? Or do I tell her that it was nice for her to have my sister as a bridesmaid, but that doesn't give her a spot on my side to fill.

-Craig.

___________

Craig,

In the year 279 BC, the Greek King Pyrrhus waged a bloody, epic battle against the Romans. You know how it goes. Think: Gladiator, 300, whatever. Chariots, archers, cavalry, severed arms, decapitations, eyeballs ripped straight from the sockets.

After two days of gory violence, Pyrrhus "won" the battle, but it cost him 3,500 men, crippled his army, and did more harm than good. According to historians (or, um, Wikipedia), the general said, "One more such victory, and we shall be undone." And hence the origin of the term: Pyrrhic Victory.

Do you have the moral high ground? Yep. Is your fiancée being unreasonable? Yep. (At least based on what you've told us.) Will making a huge deal of this only exacerbate the situation and cause  more trouble than it's worth? Yep.

The merits of your position are clear. Not only was the sister-bridesmaid her idea, but it's a qualitatively different scenario than using her guy-friends. One's family, one's not. Even if we accept her quid-pro-quo argument (which is not entirely unreasonable), the quid-pro-quo would be you tapping her brother as a groomsman, not her douchebag friends.

So, if you really want to make a stink over this, that should be your argument: the only reason that your sister is crossing the aisle is that she's your flesh-and-blood. You would never ask her to accommodate one of your platonic girlfriends.

Your other potential angle: stress the positive. Keep it upbeat. Say that this is the most important moment of your life, and it's really, really important that you have your very best childhood friends--Vince, Johnny, and Turtle or whatever--by your side.

To preach a little more to the choir: you're not crazy. While it's a (regrettable) tradition that a brother or sister can cross the aisle to be in the other's party, it is NOT normal protocol to foist your fiancée with your own buddies. Does it happen? Sure. But it's not excepted.

Sadly, we must return to the old General Pyrrhus. You could be 100% in the right, but if you bully your way and "win" this argument, it might lead to more drama, tears, and 7-hour arguments. If you're backed into a corner, I'd pick the dude you don't know over the douchebag you do.

One more thing: tone matters. Your email made us laugh--and we're a fine audience for that kinda attitude--but, we hope you realize, banish that sarcasm from any conversation with your fiancée.  When you talk to her, your attitude shouldn't be, "WTF?!?  I never signed up for this shit!"  Instead, go for something like, "Hey, it's really considerate that you picked my sister to be a bridesmaid. And my mom loves you even more now. If you want me to pick your brother (if she has one) to represent your family as a groomsman, I'm all for it. But when it comes to our friends...I think it's best that your bridesmaids are your good friends, and my groomsmen are my good friends."

If that doesn't work, you have one last card to play: offer to include her friends in the ceremony...as ushers. As we've said elsewhere, ushers are the perfect bone to throw. You give them a nice courtesy, you can have as many of you want, and, best of all, you don't have to involve them in any other activities (i.e. bachelor party).

Try that. If it works, great. If you get pushback, relent. Don't let your 3,500 troops get butchered.

Good luck.

 
 
Share
Print
Email This
 
 
Comments (4)

Disagree

I disagree with your conclusion about relenting. This guy needs to put his foot down. She is flatly wrong for even asking. Imagine what her reaction would be if he asked her to include a platonic girl friend in her bridal party -- especially one whom the bride didn't like. She'd say "no, and hell no."

And, if she's so selfish and uptight about something so insignificant, then maybe he needs reconsider. She may not be mature enough to get married.
Bill1176, August 12, 2010
 

Alternatives?

I've gotta ask the obvious: why not include them on her side? Even mainstream wedding sources (e.g. The K**t) agree that it's fine to have mixed genders on either side of the wedding party.

My fiancé and I both have men and women among our closest friends and family, so we had the choice of dividing them by gender or dividing them by relationship, and relationship just made more sense. So my brother is on my side, his (female) best friend is his "best man," etc. It's perfectly acceptable to do this, and it means that each of us have primary responsibility for the people whom we know and like. Even the girly aesthetic stuff can work; just have the men wear matching ties/vests/etc. to the color of the women's dresses.

So: say "I know it's important for you to include your friends, but I feel like I don't know them that well. How about they go on your side and my sister goes on mine?"

(And yes, don't worry, you can still make your bachelor party guys-only; your sister will understand!)
Esther, August 12, 2010
 

worked for me

My fiance wanted me to have her best guy friend as one of my groomsmen. I had never met this guy and he lives three states away. It was important that he is in the wedding. She got into a fight with her maid of honor. Her friend is now her Man of Honor. Everyone is happy.
dgreen, August 18, 2010
 

It's Ok

Your idea is good, and the approach to the problem fits me. I am nervous about my marriage nowadays that is fixed on this December. I did not arrange for any wedding accessories or other, and am still struggling with the hall and catering bookings.
Carol Napper, August 20, 2010
 
smaller | bigger
 Subscribe via email (registered users only)

security image
Write the displayed characters

Submit

busy